top of page
Search

Open Letter to PRIME MINISTER (NEW ZEALAND) to ask for FAMILY COURT to be closed down

  • Writer: taylorpamela77
    taylorpamela77
  • Apr 16, 2024
  • 10 min read

Tuesday April 16 2024 

                                                                                                                

Hon Christopher Luxon

PRIME MINISTER (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Hon Winston Peters

DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Hon David Seymour

MINISTER FOR REGULATION (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Hon Judith Collins

ATTORNEY-GENERAL (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Hon Paul Goldsmith

MINISTER OF JUSTICE (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Paul Ballantyne

PRIVATE SECETARY TO THE PRIME MINISTER (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Hon Mark Mitchell

MINISTER OF POLICE (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Hon Casey Costello

ASSOCIATE MINISTER OF POLICE (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Judge P F Boshier

PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT JUDGE (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Judge Heemi Taumaunu

CHIEF DISTRICT COURT JUDGE (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Judge Jackie Moran

PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT JUDGE (NEW ZEALAND)

 

William McGimpsey

PUBLIC POLICY PROFESSIONAL (NEW ZEALAND)

 

Sally McMillan

DUNEDIN FAMILY COURT LAWYER

 

Louise Garthwaite

DUNEDIN FAMILY COURT LAWYER

 

Rachel Green

DUNEDIN FAMILY COURT STAFF

 

Good Afternoon,

 

Notice to one is notice to all; delivered by a combination of email and postage.

 

We notice you from the Office of the General Executor of the Estate of PAMELA MARILYN TAYLOR, JASMINE ELIZABETH TAYLOR, ANNABELLE HANNAH TAYLOR and ALICE SAMANTHA TAYLOR (ens legis); there is no consent from Pamela (suri juris) for the (PARENTING ORDER CARE OF CHILDREN ACT 2004 FAM-2022-012-057) application made to (IN THE FAMILY COURT AT DUNEDIN I TE KŌTI Ā-WHĀNAU KI ŌTEPOTI);


There is no consent to the (PARENTING ORDER CARE OF CHILDREN ACT 2004 FAM-2022-012-057), there is no contract with the FAMILY COURT, stop no trespassing. The Estate of (PAMELA MARILYN TAYLOR), (JASMINE ELIZABETH TAYLOR), ANNABELLE HANNAH TAYLOR and ALICE SAMANTHA TAYLOR (ens legis) is PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY;


We, Pamela, (suri juris) along with my daughters Jasmine, (suri juris), Annabelle, (suri juris), and Alice, (suri juris) alive standing in our natural state; the flesh lives and the blood flows; (c.f. s 381 (2) Criminal Procedure Act 2011). Suri juris is of our own right; possession full, social and civil right not under any legal disability or the power of another or guardianship;


We, Pamela, (suri juris), Jasmine, (suri juris), Annabelle, (suri juris), and Alice, (suri juris) are not a ‘Person’ in any description; all man made law is artificial and only binds artificial persons. We are not a ‘person’, we are not a trade name, corporation, corporate, artificial entity, mask, fictitious person whose name is written in legalese;


Maxims in Law: “The presence of the body cures the error in the name; the truth of the name cures an error in the description.” We are alive, we are only bound by the Lore of Nature and Gods Lore, as you are bound by the law of contract. We give no consent, no contract to FAMILY COURT coercive control of us;


Case precedence states that the crown corporation has no jurisdiction upon mankind in his natural state. The following excerpt from a 1796 US Court Case tells us the true status of government relative to free will of men: “Everyman is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.” (CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 May Term 1796);


As a Crown Agent employed by the corporation “HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND” SEC CIK #0000216105 your legislation binds the Crown; all acts bind the crown; as you are bound by statutes, legislation, dealing with the decedent (person);


We notice you that as an Agent of the Crown (c.f. s 16c Secret Commissions Act 1910) you hold a fiduciary obligation (c.f. s148 Public Trust Act 2001) and are bound by the rules of equity (c.f. s5 Imperial Laws Applications Act 1988) and the principles of fairness and natural justice; It is inexcusable to ignore your rights;


We notice you of our personal grievances regarding the failure in fiduciary duties by your “Public Service employees” who are employed by “HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND” company or “HIS MAJESTY THE KING IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND” company. “Public Service employee” includes reference to an employee of a Crown entity and a reference to “the employees’ current department or interdepartmental venture” includes a reference to the employee’s current Crown entity;

 

We notice you of the failure in fiduciary duties by (IN THE FAMILY COURT AT DUNEDIN I TE KŌTI Ā-WHĀNAU KI ŌTEPOTI) CROWN Agents, Judges, corporation staff, registered lawyers, persons, and Public Service employees causes extreme harm, encumbrances, burden, stress, distress, loss, load, demand, wage, drain, pressure upon families and violates our Inalienable and our Unalienable Rights. These Inalienable and Unalienable Rights are derived by God and not by the pen of other Men or Women and they do not cease to exist due to violent Men or Women or organized groups of violent Men or Women violating them;

 

In fact, we notice you that your FINAL PARENTING ORDER CARE OF CHILDREN ACT 2004 FAM-2022-012-057 is deceiving in words for pecuniary gain (c.f. s240 Crimes Act 1966); by obtaining by deception and causing loss by deception without claim of right;



In fact, we notice you that your FINAL PARENTING ORDER CARE OF CHILDREN ACT 2004 FAM-2022-012-057 is the Crime of Fraud being committed by (IN THE FAMILY COURT AT DUNEDIN I TE KŌTI Ā-WHĀNAU KI ŌTEPOTI) by CROWN Agents, Judges, persons, corporation staff and Public Service employees. Fraud is the intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right. We have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence involving serious or complex fraud may have been committed by the FAMILY COURT Agents, as Fraud is a Crime under (Sections 240 of the Crimes Act 1961). We report this Crime of Fraud to MINISTER OF POLICE under the Serious Fraud Office Act 1990 that we suspect widespread scale of fraud, deceiving and misrepresenting and the consequences of the fraud causes stress to families. Every person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years who, without reasonable excuse, sells, transfers, or otherwise makes available any document or thing capable of being used to derive a pecuniary advantage knowing that, by deception and without claim of right, the document or thing was, or was caused to be, delivered, executed, made, accepted, endorsed, or altered. I do not want to be involved in this Fraud. I keep the FAMILY COURT paperwork, such as PARENTING ORDERS, birth certificate and drivers licence as proof of the Crime of Fraud, so that I can show you the Fraud;



In fact, we notice you of Crime of Perjury being committed by (IN THE FAMILY COURT AT DUNEDIN I TE KŌTI Ā-WHĀNAU KI ŌTEPOTI) CROWN Agents, Judges, corporation staff and Public Service employees. Perjury (also known as foreswearing) is the intentional act of swearing a false oath or falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to an official proceeding. Perjury is a Crime under (Sections 108 and 109 Crimes Act 1961). Perjury is an assertion as to a matter of fact, opinion, belief, or knowledge made by a witness in a judicial proceeding as part of his or her evidence on oath, whether the evidence is given in open court or by affidavit or otherwise, that assertion being known to the witness to be false and being intended by him or her to mislead the tribunal holding the proceeding; Here is evidence of the Crime of Perjury. The CROWN Agents make the false claim that the “FINAL PARENTING ORDER” is “by Consent.”

 


 

 

In fact, we notice you in February & March 2022 Michael, Michael’s Lawyer and the Family Court Staff were threatening to breach the Chemical Weapons (Prohibition) Act 1996 and the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC); as they were threatening to kill [or inflict grievous bodily harm] under (Section 306 of the Crimes Act 1961) on Jasmine, (suri juris), Annabelle, (suri juris), and Alice, (suri juris) by using the Biological and Chemical Weapon which in its marketing is often called the mRNA COVID-19 Biotech Vaccine; As per US Patent Number 9539210, VACCINE NANOTECHNOLOGY is a toxin which is a chemical weapon it states  "In some embodiments, the B cell antigen is a toxin. In some embodiments, the toxin is from a chemical weapon. In some embodiments, the toxin from a chemical weapon is botulinum toxin or phosphene. Toxins from a chemical weapon also include, but are not limited to..."


In fact the mRNA COVID-19 Biological and Chemical Weapon causes “Grievous bodily harm” which is really serious harm interfering with health or human function as the genetically engineered modified RNA—is a molecule that contains the instructions that directs the cells to make an abnormal protein. To enter cells smoothly, mRNA travels within a protective bubble called a Lipid Nanoparticle also known as Graphene Oxide which is like razor blades that cut up the cells. Once inside, our cells read the mRNA as a set of instructions, building proteins of pathogens called antigens. The immune system sees these foreign antigens as invaders;


In fact I am certain that Mr TAYLOR intended Pamela Suri Juris to take the death threats against Jasmine, Annabelle and Alice seriously. I am certain that the death threats and intimidation was used to control me. I was, and I am still concerned for the safety of my daughters, as I was extremely concerned that the physical violence of injecting a biological and chemical weapon into them may occur. The Family Court Staff and Lawyers clearly communicated their desire to have biological mothers and fathers along with their children shot with the mRNA COVID-19 biotech biological and chemical weapons; 


In fact the FAMILY COURT CROWN Agents failed to give proper consideration to Inalienable Rights, as a result, their decisions are unlawful by discriminating against us due to us valuing our lives and our health.

 

In fact we notice you that CROWN Agents within the Family Court actions have been a violation of the Section 15 of the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 (“the Act”). Which states “Orders by consent. On an application for the exercise of a court’s jurisdiction under this Part, a Family Court Judge or Family Court Associate may make any order under section 10 or section 11 or section 12 or section 14 with the consent of each party to the proceedings, if the Judge or Family Court Associate is satisfied that the person in respect of whom the application is made understands the nature and foresees the consequences of the order and consents to it.” We Pamela, (suri juris), Jasmine, (suri juris), Annabelle, (suri juris), and Alice, (suri juris) do not consent to the PARENTING ORDERS;

 

In fact we notice you that CROWN Agents within the Family Court actions have been a violation of Section 4 of THE MENTAL HEALTH (COMPULSORY ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT) ACT 1992.  People have the right to be presumed, until the contrary is proved, to be competent to manage their own affairs in relation to their own private property. In General rules relating to liability to assessment or treatment under the MENTAL HEALTH (COMPULSORY ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT) ACT 1992 is it shall not be invoked by reason only of someone’s political, religious, or cultural beliefs. The CROWN Agents in the FAMILY COURT unlawfully, illegally and forcibly had me physically dragged out of my home in handcuffs, falsely arrested, and imprisoned because I do not inject biological and chemocial weapons into my body and I do consent to the “FAMILY COURT PARENTING ORDERS” as we always act to protect and promote the health, safety, life, welfare and best interests of Pamela, (suri juris), Jasmine, (suri juris), Annabelle, (suri juris), and Alice, (suri juris).


In fact we notice you that there is no legal, lawful agreement with the (IN THE FAMILY COURT AT DUNEDIN I TE KŌTI Ā-WHĀNAU KI ŌTEPOTI) that has been obtained without unlawful fraud, threats to kill (or inflict grievous bodily harm) on my daughters, kidnapping threats towards my daughters, kidnapping actions towards me, psychological, physical, financial, housing stress and duress etc. No contract was entered into under my own free will, all documents were signed under duress, under the threat to kill (or inflict grievous bodily harm) on my daughters, the “PARENTING ORDERS” are not fair and reasonable, and have never done as an act of good faith by the CROWN Agents;

 

In fact we notice you we do not consent to the (FINAL PARENTING ORDER CARE OF CHILDREN ACT 2004). I do not consent to contract with the (IN THE FAMILY COURT AT DUNEDIN I TE KŌTI Ā-WHĀNAU KI ŌTEPOTI) CROWN Agents, Judges, corporation staff, registered lawyers, persons, and Public Service employees. Both parties in the contract must give their consent voluntarily. I do not consent. I have not consented verbally and in writing. To state “by consent” is to state a lie.  

 

In fact we notice you the CROWN Agents, Judges, corporation staff, registered lawyers, persons, and Public Service employees in the FAMILY COURT have attempted to deceive, committed the crime of Fraud deceiving in words for pecuniary gain (c.f. s240 Crimes Act 1966), committed the crime of Perjury (Sections 108 and 109 Crimes Act 1961), threatening to kill [or inflict grievous bodily harm] under (Section 306 of the Crimes Act 1961), threatened to breach the Chemical Weapons (Prohibition) Act 1996 and threatened to breach the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC);

 

In fact we notice you that there is no lawful consent, and no lawful contract between us and the FAMILY COURT. I would like the CROWN Agents to stop sending us unlawful, and illegal fraudulent paperwork or using or threatening physical violence against us in order to intimidate and pressure us;

 

In fact we notice you the FAMILY COURT, CROWN Agents have created all this fake paperwork called “FINAL PARENTING ORDER” using lies, deception, fraud and perjury to keep me and my daughters inside their jurisdiction so that they can carry on with their tyrannical criminal activity, to kidnap me from my home, to threaten to kidnap my children off me and to gain monies off me illegally and unlawfully; I do not consent to pay the FAMILY COURT my money;  

 

We notice you that the FAMILY COURT, CROWN Agents do not reply to my paperwork, they do not rebut my AFFIDAVIT’s. We order for FAMILY COURT CROWN Agents to CEASE AND DESIST as their unlawful criminal actions that are causing us harm, we wish for justice and a full criminal investigation into the criminal actions of the CROWN Agents within the FAMILY COURT, the POLICE and the HEALTHCARE workers have done to us and to others like us, and we wish for financial compensation due to the psychological, physical and economical damage their criminal actions have already caused us;

 

As your legislation binds the Crown; all acts bind the crown; as you are bound by statutes, legislation, dealing with the decedent (person); therefore in accordance with your legislation we notice you to begin a criminal investigation into the DUNEDIN FAMILY COURT CROWN Agents whom are operating unlawfully;


We consider this now to be a matter of urgency – the FAMILY COURT CROWN Agents are harming vulnerable families through their unlawful activities, and there is a lack of evidence supporting the continued operations of the FAMILY COURT. The NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT must move swiftly to protect NEW ZEALAND families and close down the FAMILY COURTS. People should try and work out your family disagreements without getting the FAMILY COURT involved. This is better for everyone involved as the CROWN AGENTS are involved in actively undermining the people trying to protect and provide for the children, in order to create worse short- and long-term outcomes for children. In order to sustain public confidence in the rule of law the CROWN AGENTS should not be attacking and undermining people, by violating their Inalienable and Unalienable Rights while they are trying to protect and provide for their children. Gaslighting and calling people mentally disordered or crazy when they want to be free to live in a home, eat food at home, in a cafe and restaurant, go to the beach, church, swimming pools and playgrounds, read books and do art with their children, buy clothes, and toys, have their Inalienable and Unalienable Rights, their bodily integrity respected is cruel and horrible behavior. It is a serious crime to deprive others of the opportunity to live healthy, happy prosperous lives with self-determination, free from coercive control, intimidation, threats, economic, psychological and physical violence.


All Rights Reserved. No Assured Value. No Liability. Errors and Omissions Accepted. I am not a lawyer, this is written by our hand, and the interpretations are the interpretations that we say they are.  

 

Kind Regards

 

Pamela

Single Mother living in Dunedin

021978093

 

 

 

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page