ARE REDACTOR CODES ONLY USED TO COVER UP GOVERNMENT CRIMES AGAINST PEOPLE?

Released with some information withheld documents from the Government is business as usual when the Government Employees have been doing criminal activities. I compare redactor codes used for Pfizer documents and redactor codes used for Posie Parker Woman Rights Event in Auckland.

Are redactor codes a threat to the National security of New Zealand? The safety of New Zealanders being able to go about their daily business confidently free from fear and able to make the most of opportunities to advance their way of life, with protection and the preservation of people, and of property and information, both tangible and intangible, requires the Government Agents to be held to account for their actions. Redactor Codes are putting the security or safety of New Zealanders our sovereignty, reputation, or critical interests abroad at risk.

WHEREAS the Ministry of Health are mandated explicitly through legislation of the Epidemic Preparedness Act 2006 and the Health Act 1956 to manage an emergency arising from Infectious human disease (pandemic). The Ministry of Health and other Government Corporations, are mandated explicitly to ensure public safety, protect human life and alleviate suffering; preserve sovereignty, and minimize impacts on society, the economy, and the environment; support the continuity of everyday activity, and the early restoration of disrupted services; and uphold the rule of law, democratic institutions and national values.

WHEREAS the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service was fully aware that they held NO evidence regarding the exitance of SARS-COV-2 or the disease called COVID-19 in January 2022.

WHEREAS In the MEDSAFE FILES the documents are covered with redactor codes. For example, the New Medicine Application cover letter is released with some information withheld under the following sections of the Act: section 9(2)(a) to protect the privacy of natural persons; section 9(2)(b)(ii) where its release would likely unreasonably prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied the information; and section 9(2)(ba)(i) to protect information that is subject to an obligation of confidence and making it available would likely prejudice the supply of similar information, or information from the same source. Below is an example of the MEDSAFE Table about the Pfizer COVID-19 Injection.

WHEREAS in the FDA FILES they also are covered in redactor codes. They prefer (b) (4) Reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system. Below is an example of the FDA Table about the Pfizer COVID-19 Injection.

WHEREAS in the EU and Pfizer sales documents you can find a redactor copy of Tables as well as Tables that are not redacted.

WHEREAS as we can see where the redactor code in New Zealand section 9(2)(b)(ii) "where its release would likely unreasonably prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied the information"; a redactor code of (b) (4) "Reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system" is used in the US.

WHEREAS responses from the NZ Police to Official Information Act requests relating to The Posie Parker Let Woman Speak Auckland Event made in late March remain long overdue. In the Police response it is "Out of Scope of the Police" and it is withheld 9(2)(a) "is subject to a public interest." The public interest is broadly equivalent to the concept of the public good. It can cover a wide range of values and principles relating to the public good, or what is in the best interests of society. In Socialist/ Communist/ Eugenic Regimes it is considered in the Public Interest to Genocide the Population, Violate the People's Inalienable Rights, destroy the economy, and to create man-made famines, so we must assume that is this Labour Governments interpretation of Public Interest as we have never witnessed their "Public Interest" to refer to something positive in the past six years.

This next Posie Parker email from the Police use the Redactor Codes, Section 9 (2) (a) protect the privacy of natural persons, Section 9 (2) (g) (i) the free and frank expression of opinions by or between or to Ministers of the Crown or members of an organisation or officers and employees of any public service agency or organisation in the course of their duty, Section 6 (c) provides good reason to withhold official information where release would be likely ‘to prejudice the maintenance of the law.

WHEREAS the NEW ZEALAND POLICE refused to protect woman in Auckland, and they refused to defend Female based Rights. ‘Gender Identity Ideology’ has serious consequences for Woman’s rights. Women’s rights are protected in law in New Zealand (Human Rights Act, 1993) based on sex. Self-ID preferences the concept of ‘gender identity’ above sex, and therefore undermines women’s sex-based rights.

WHEREAS the NEW ZEALAND JUDGES refused to protect Woman Rights to free speech and to physical safety in Auckland by allowing biological men to verbally intimidated and threaten them, and violently physically assault peaceful Woman at a Woman Event in Auckland.

WHEREAS there has been a long history of discrimination against women in New Zealand, giving rise to the need for specific protections for girls and women, including retaining safe private spaces for women, and there is a grossly disproportionate likelihood that women will experience sexual or domestic violence perpetrated by men. Women’s spaces must remain protected as having a special status and serving a special need. Having biological Men access women’s spaces at any time, having self-proclaimed that they are a woman, is problematic for women accessing women’s spaces and services whose lived experiences (such as surviving sexual violence) or protected characteristics (such as religion that requires sex-segregation for certain activities) make it essential that women’s spaces remain sex-segregated. Silencing women and their views and dismissing their safety concerns, based on their lived experiences, as ‘hate speech’ and ‘transphobia’, perpetuates the structural violence that girls and women in New Zealand.

WHEREAS an area of concern in New Zealand is the current government to be teaching children about Puberty Blockers (current Ministry of Education sexual health documents released September 2020). This indicates bias outcomes and will create a crisis within school age children wanting to access Puberty Blockers when there is clear evidence that this is dangerous, experimental, not reversible, sterilizes them, increases health problems, and lacks sufficient evidence to support a theory of a child being born in the wrong body. The advertising and teaching of Puberty Blockers in Sexual Education materials will have legal ramifications for consent and future lawsuits when the child has negative side effects or changes their mind with irreversible damage being done to their body.

In CONCLUSION why does the Government use Redactor Codes when they are acting unlawfully, is it solely to protect the individual Government Agents when they are breaking laws to push dangerous Political Ideologies?